Background: Various types of reconstruction have been employed in attempts to improve the quality of life after total gastrectomy. The use of a jejunal pouch has been the most common approach, and preservation of the duodenal passage has been recommended in several related studies. The aim of the present study was to investigate the benefit of the use of a segment of transverse colon as a gastric substitute.
Methods: Isoperistaltic interposition with a segment of transverse colon was performed after total gastrectomy in 18 patients with gastric malignancies. To clarify the benefits and disadvantages of this technique, a comparison was made between these patients and another 17 patients who underwent jejunal interposition without a pouch. The parameters to be compared included operation time, amount of blood loss, incidence of postoperative complications, and changes in body weight.
Results: Postoperative complications were more frequent in the patients reconstructed with the transverse colon, despite a lower incidence of extended lymphadenectomies in this group of patients. No advantage over those treated by the jejunal interposition, in terms of postoperative body weight, was evident during 2 years of follow-up.
Conclusion: Although it may be too early to draw definite conclusions, there seems to be little benefit in the use of the transverse colon as a gastric substitute.