Background: In human ventricular myocardium, contractile force increases at higher stimulation frequencies (positive force-frequency relation). In failing hearts, the force-frequency relation (FFR) is negative. Data on the effect of volatile anesthetics on FFR are very limited.
Methods: The authors obtained left ventricular tissue from 18 explanted hearts from patients undergoing cardiac transplantation and tissue of 8 organ donors. The negative inotropic effect of halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on isometric force of contraction of isolated muscle preparations at a stimulation frequency of 1 and 3 Hz and the effect of each anesthetic on the FFR were studied. Ryanodine and verapamil were studied for comparison. In addition, the effect of the anesthetics on Ca(2+)-dependent (3)H-ryanodine binding was investigated.
Results: In nonfailing myocardium, halothane was the strongest negative inotropic compound, and the positive FFR was not affected by either drug. In failing myocardium, halothane also showed the strongest negative inotropic effect, but the positive shape of FFR was restored by halothane and ryanodine. In contrast, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and verapamil did not change FFR. Only halothane shifted the Ca(2+)-dependent (3)H-ryanodine binding curve toward lower Ca(2+) concentrations.
Conclusion: In nonfailing human myocardium, none of the anesthetics affect FFR, but halothane is the strongest negative inotropic compound. In failing myocardium, halothane, but not isoflurane or sevoflurane, restores the positive shape of FFR. Both the more pronounced negative inotropic effect of halothane and the restoration of the positive shape of FFR in failing myocardium in the presence of halothane can be explained by its interaction with the myocardial sarcoplasmic reticulum calcium-release channel.