Are pregnant women fetal containers?

Bioethics. 1990 Oct;4(4):273-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1990.tb00092.x.

Abstract

KIE: Purdy explores the argument that women's rights to control their bodies should be subordinated to the welfare of their fetuses. She gives examples ofinstances where women's decisions about pregnancy and childbirth have been overridden by physicians and judges. She examines the nature of the mother fetus relationship, the social context of the current conflict between maternal and fetal rights, and the extent of a woman's legally enforceable duty to her fetus. Purdy acknowledges that women may owe a reasonable duty to their fetuses to try to prevent disease or handicap. However, given the uncertainties of modern medicine, the value-laden nature of many physicians' decisions, and the lack of adequate adequate prenatal care, women should not be held responsible for situations that are due largely to society's shortcomings. Purdy concludes that it is unjust to use the law to coerce women into accepting medical advice.

MeSH terms

  • Beginning of Human Life
  • Civil Rights
  • Coercion
  • Conflict of Interest
  • Decision Making
  • Ethics*
  • Female
  • Fetus*
  • Hazardous Substances
  • Human Rights
  • Humans
  • Individuality
  • Judicial Role
  • Jurisprudence
  • Life
  • Maternal-Fetal Relations*
  • Moral Obligations*
  • Parent-Child Relations
  • Personhood
  • Physicians
  • Policy Making
  • Poverty
  • Pregnancy*
  • Pregnant Women*
  • Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
  • Public Policy*
  • Social Responsibility*
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Substance-Related Disorders
  • Treatment Refusal*
  • United States
  • Vulnerable Populations
  • Women's Rights*

Substances

  • Hazardous Substances