Objective: Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy for carotid and vertebrobasilar stroke may result in a more rapid clot lysis and higher recanalization rates than can be achieved with intravenous thrombolysis and thus may warrant the more invasive and time-consuming therapeutic approach. We present an overview of all hitherto completed trials of intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy for carotid and vertebrobasilar artery stroke including recommendations for therapy and a meta-analysis. Furthermore, new imaging techniques such as diffusion- and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and their impact on patient selection are discussed. Finally, phase IV trials of thrombolysis in general and cost efficacy analyses are presented.
Data sources: We performed an extensive literature search not only to identify the larger and well-known randomized trials but also to identify smaller pilot studies and case series. Trials included in this review, among others, are the PROACT I and PROACT II studies and the Cochrane Library report.
Conclusion: Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy of acute M1 and M2 occlusions with 9 mg/2 hrs pro-urokinase significantly improves outcome if administered within 6 hrs after stroke onset. Seven patients need to be treated to prevent one patient from death or dependence. Vertebrobasilar occlusion has a grim prognosis and intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy to date is the only life-saving therapy that has demonstrated benefit with regard to mortality and outcome, albeit not in a randomized trial. New magnetic resonance imaging techniques may facilitate and improve the selection of patients for thrombolytic therapy. Presently, thrombolytic therapy is still underutilized because of problems with clinical and time criteria, and lack of public and professional education to regard stroke as a treatable emergency. If applied more widely, thrombolytic therapy may result in profound cost savings in health care and reduction of long-term disability of stroke patients.