The effects of alpha-human atrial natriuretic peptide (HANP) and milrinone on cerebral pial vessels, especially during blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, are not clear. We studied topical HANP (10(-14), 10(-12), and 10(-10) M) or milrinone (10(-7), 10(-5), and 10(-3) M), and IV HANP (0.1, 0.2, and 1.0 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) or milrinone (0.5, 5.0, and 20.0 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)) with or without hyperosmolar BBB disruption, using a rabbit cranial window preparation. At 10(-12) and 10(-10) M topical HANP produced significant arteriolar (16%, 20%, respectively), but no venular dilation. Topical milrinone (10(-3) M) produced significant arteriolar and venular dilation (21%, 8%, respectively). IV HANP produced no arteriolar or venular changes at any dose except during BBB disruption, when it caused a significant arteriolar (16%, 16%, and 17%, respectively), but no venular dilation. In contrast, IV milrinone caused small but significant arteriolar and venular dilation without BBB disruption (arterioles, 6%, 7% and 8%, respectively; venules, 6% at 20.0 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)). During BBB disruption, these responses to milrinone were similar. Although HANP and milrinone each have a direct vasodilator effect on arterioles, their systemic administration at clinical doses could induce different effects. BBB disruptive conditions could increase the response of pial vessels to systemically administered HANP.
Implications: Although alpha-human atrial natriuretic peptide (HANP) and milrinone each have a direct vasodilator effect on cerebral pial arterioles, their systemic administration at clinical doses could have different effects and blood-brain-barrier disruptive conditions could alter the response of pial vessels to HANP, but not to milrinone.