Factors influencing the shape of the inspiratory flow

Respir Physiol. 2001 Jul;126(3):211-9. doi: 10.1016/s0034-5687(01)00224-9.

Abstract

An index (IS), quantitating the departure of the inspiratory flow profile (IFP) from the rectangular one, i.e. the optimal profile (IS=0), was computed from pneumotachograms recorded in 26 normal, anesthetized subjects breathing spontaneously through the endotracheal tube (ETT) or face mask (FM) with or without added resistances (R) and in 27 awake subjects breathing through the mouth and FM in the supine and seated posture at rest and during exercise (40 W) on a cycloergometer, through the nose and FM, and through the mouthpiece (MP). During anesthesia, IS decreased with R both while breathing through the ETT (DeltaIS=-0.037+/-0.006 (SE); P<0.001) and FM (DeltaIS=-0.054+/-0.008; P<0.001). This indicates that (a) the change of IFP towards the optimal shape is reflex in nature and related to the dynamic inspiratory load, and (b) tracheobronchial mechanoreceptors and inspiratory muscles are involved in this response. The reflex is also operative in awake subjects, since IS decreased whenever the inspiratory dynamic load was increased, as on turning from seated to supine posture (DeltaIS=-0.024+/-0.003; P<0.001), shifting from mouth to nose breathing (DeltaIS=-0.034+/-0.003; P<0.05), from rest to mild exercise (DeltaIS=-0.066+/-0.005; P<0.001). The different IS value between FM and MP breathing (DeltaIS=0.036+/-0.004; P<0.001) indicates, however, that other factors, likely behavioral, also affect the IFP.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Airway Resistance
  • Anesthesia
  • Bicycling
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Intratracheal
  • Male
  • Masks
  • Mouth Breathing
  • Nasal Cavity / physiology
  • Posture / physiology
  • Pulmonary Ventilation / physiology*
  • Supine Position
  • Wakefulness