Conservative versus operative treatment for displaced ankle fractures in patients over 55 years of age. A prospective, randomised study

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 May;83(4):525-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b4.11522.

Abstract

Forty-seven patients over the age of 55 years with a displaced fracture of the ankle were entered into a prospective, randomised study in order to compare open reduction and internal fixation with closed treatment in a plaster cast; 36 were reviewed after a mean of 27 months. The outcome was assessed clinically, radiologically and functionally using the Olerud score. The results showed that anatomical reduction was significantly less reliable (p = 0.03) and loss of reduction significantly more common (p = 0.001) in the group with closed treatment. Those managed by open reduction and internal fixation had a significantly higher functional outcome score (p = 0.03) and a significantly better range of movement of the ankle (p = 0.044) at review.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Ankle Injuries / therapy*
  • Casts, Surgical
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Fractures, Bone / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Range of Motion, Articular