[Comparison of four protocols for preoperative preparation in cattle]

Can Vet J. 2001 Mar;42(3):199-203.
[Article in French]

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate 4 preoperative skin preparations, that is, more specifically, to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) and povidone-iodine (PI), as well as 2 hair removal techniques (clipper alone or clipper followed by razor) for preoperative skin preparation in cattle. The 4 protocols resulted in a significant decrease in the number of bacterial colony-forming units (cfu). Group 4 (clipping + shaving + CG) had a significantly lower number of preoperative cfu per gel plate compared with groups 1 (clipping + PI) and 3 (clipping + shaving + PI). Skin reaction frequency was significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 (47.8% for both protocols) than in groups 1 and 2 (clipping + PI or CG) (8.7% for both). Wound infection frequency was 4.3% (4/92) and no significant difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups. The 4 protocols tested were equivalent as to efficacy and satisfactorily decreased skin microflora. Clipping alone was shown to be preferable to clipping plus shaving as a method of hair removal in cattle, with fewer skin reactions and no more wound infections.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / standards*
  • Cattle / surgery*
  • Cattle Diseases / prevention & control
  • Chlorhexidine / analogs & derivatives*
  • Chlorhexidine / standards*
  • Colony Count, Microbial
  • Hair Removal / methods
  • Hair Removal / veterinary*
  • Povidone-Iodine / standards*
  • Preoperative Care / veterinary*
  • Surgical Wound Infection / prevention & control
  • Surgical Wound Infection / veterinary

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Povidone-Iodine
  • chlorhexidine gluconate
  • Chlorhexidine