[Magnetization transfer contrast (MTC): optimizing off-resonance and on-resonance frequency MTC methods at 0.5 and 1.5 T]

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2001 Jan-Feb;46(1-2):10-7. doi: 10.1515/bmte.2001.46.1-2.10.
[Article in German]

Abstract

Aim: To compare technical parameters and clinically relevant aspects of on- and off-resonance MTC sequences in mid- and high-field MR systems.

Material and methods: Both on- and off-resonance techniques were combined with an FFE sequence using 0.5 and 1.5 Tesla superconducting systems. Parameters were systematically measured by scanning a cadaveric knee joint. Signal-to-noise ratios and MT ratios for fat, cartilage and reference solution (copper sulphate) were determined. Minimal TR and the energy absorption rate were also compared.

Results: The MT effect at 1.5 T was more pronounced. However, using optimized parameters, clinically adequate MT contrast was achieved with both techniques and both MT units. The most important parameters for the off-resonance method are pulse angle and off-centre frequency; for the on-resonance method, pulse angle and number of composite pulse elements. Energy absorption was below 2 W/kg. Minimal TR was prolonged by up to 400%.

Conclusion: In order to produce MTC images, optimized parameters should be applied. Using optimized pulse parameters, adequate MTC imaging is achievable with mid- and high-field systems using on- and off-resonance techniques. To ensure comparability of MTC studies, the pulse parameters need to be given, and, ideally, standardized.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / diagnosis*
  • Fourier Analysis
  • Humans
  • Image Enhancement / instrumentation*
  • Knee / blood supply
  • Knee / pathology*
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging / instrumentation*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Sensitivity and Specificity