Background: Intercomparisons of PCR-based data between laboratories require an assurance of assay reproducibility. We performed an interlaboratory study to investigate the contribution made by a variety of thermal cyclers to PCR performance as measured by interblock reproducibility and intrablock repeatability.
Methods: Two standardized assays designed to minimize the introduction of non-thermal-cycler-dependent variations were evaluated by 18 laboratories in the United Kingdom, using 33 thermal cyclers of various makes and models. We used a single-product (590 bp) PCR, established in our laboratory as a robust and specific reaction. The second reaction, a multiproduct random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) PCR, was known to be more susceptible to small changes in block temperature and was therefore considered a way of assessing block uniformity with respect to temperature. Assay repeatability data were analyzed with respect to temperature calibration status, the type of temperature control mechanism, thermal cycler age, and the presence of oil overlay or heated lid systems.
Results: All (100%) of the laboratories produced the correct target for the single-product PCR assay, although substantial variation in yield in replicate reactions was observed in 9.4% of these. The RAPD reaction generated results that varied extensively both within the same block and between different thermal cyclers. For eight replicates of a positive sample, 88% intrablock repeatability was demonstrated in calibrated thermal cyclers, which decreased to 63% in noncalibrated instruments.
Conclusions: Irrespective of the make and model of thermal cycler, temperature-calibrated instruments consistently generated more repeatable RAPD data than noncalibrated instruments. Guidelines are offered on optimizing and monitoring thermal cycler performance.