Tibial quantitative ultrasound versus whole-body and lumbar spine DXA in a Dutch pediatric and adolescent population

Invest Radiol. 2000 Sep;35(9):548-52. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200009000-00005.

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To understand normal bone development, studies in healthy children and adolescents are important. To assess the applicability of tibial quantitative ultrasound measurements (QUS) in children, we performed a study that compared dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and whole body with tibial QUS.

Methods: For this study we recruited 146 Dutch children and adolescents, 58 boys (median age, 14.1 years; range, 7.6-23.4 years) and 88 girls (median age, 18.0 years; range, 7.6-23.5 years). Tanner stage, weight, and height were assessed for all participants. Bone mineral density (BMD; g x cm(-2)) of the whole body and lumbar spine (L2-L4) and bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) of the lumbar spine (g x cm(-3)) were assessed by using the Lunar DPXL. For tibial QUS, the Soundscan compact system was used.

Results: Both lumbar as well as whole-body BMD showed a strong, significant correlation with tibial QUS in boys and girls: rtotal body boys = 0.81, rtotal body girls = 0.77, rlumbar spine boys = 0.79, and rlumbar spine girls = 0.72. Lumbar spine BMAD also showed significant correlations with tibial QUS: rboys= 0.63 and rgirls = 0.63 (for all correlations, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study showing strong, significant correlations between DXA and tibial QUS measurements suggests that tibial QUS is a technique that may be applicable in children and adolescents.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Absorptiometry, Photon*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Bone Density*
  • Bone Development*
  • Child
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Lumbar Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging*
  • Male
  • Sex Factors
  • Tibia / diagnostic imaging*
  • Ultrasonography