Selecting high-priority hazardous chemicals for tri-national control: a maximum-utility method applied to Mexico

Int J Occup Environ Health. 2000 Jul-Sep;6(3):220-37. doi: 10.1179/oeh.2000.6.3.220.

Abstract

The dispersion of persistent, bioaccumulative toxic chemicals poses risks to human health and the integrity of the ecosystem on a continental scale. Mexico, the United States, and Canada sought to add two pollutants to an existing list of four subject to North American Regional Action Plans (chlordane, DDT, mercury, PCBs). Mexican negotiators used results from an internal selection process, applying 14 criteria in five categories-physicochemical, health-endpoint, data quality/quantity, exposure potential, and control feasibility-to a baseline group of over 4,700 substances. Using policy analysis by the multiattribute maximum-utility method, progressive application of criteria and weighting algorithms acted like successive filters to identify priority lists of 15 and 7 substances/substance groups for Mexico. The 15 are: 1) benzo-a-pyrene (1 other PAHs); 2) cadmium; 3) heptachlor; 4) hexachlorobenzene; 5) lead; 6) lindane (+ other HCH isomers); 7) 2,3, 7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (&plus other PCDDs); 8) aldrin; 9) arsenic; 10) chromium; 11) carbon tetrachloride; 12) 3-3'-dichlorobenzidine; 13) dieldrin; 14) nickel; and 15) toxaphene. The first seven are the priority list of seven.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Body Burden
  • Canada
  • Decision Trees
  • Environmental Pollution / prevention & control*
  • Hazardous Substances* / adverse effects
  • Health Policy*
  • Health Priorities / organization & administration*
  • Humans
  • International Cooperation*
  • Mexico
  • Neoplasms / chemically induced
  • Probability
  • Public Health Practice
  • Regional Medical Programs / organization & administration*
  • Risk Management
  • United States

Substances

  • Hazardous Substances