Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2000 Jun;129(2):242-61. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.2.242.

Abstract

The author used the remember/know paradigm and the dual process recognition model of A. P. Yonelinas, N. E. A. Kroll, I. Dobbins, M. Lazzara, and R. T. Knight (1998) to study the states of awareness accompanying recognition of affective images and the processes of recollection and familiarity that may underlie them. Results from all experiments showed that (a) negative stimuli tended to be remembered, whereas positive stimuli tended to be known; (b) recollection, but not familiarity, was boosted for negative or highly arousing and, to a lesser extent, positive stimuli; and (c) across experiments, variations in depth of encoding did not influence these patterns. These data suggest that greater recollection for affective events leads them to be more richly experienced in memory, and they are consistent with the idea that the states of remembering and knowing are experientially exclusive, whereas the processes underlying them are functionally independent.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Affect*
  • Arousal
  • Female
  • Galvanic Skin Response
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mental Recall*
  • Pattern Recognition, Visual
  • Retention, Psychology*
  • Students / psychology