The purpose of this study was to examine a new method for calculating the O(2) deficit that considered the O(2) uptake (VO(2)) kinetics during exercise as two separate phases in light of previous research in which it was shown that the traditional O(2) deficit calculation overestimated the recovery O(2) consumption (ROC). Eight subjects completed exercise transitions between unloaded cycling and 25% (heavy, H) or 50% (very heavy, VH) of the difference between the lactic acid threshold (LAT) and peak VO(2) for 8 min. The O(2) deficit, calculated in the traditional manner, was significantly greater than the measured ROC for both above-LAT exercises: 4.03 +/- 1.01 vs. 2.63 +/- 0.80 (SD) liters for VH and 2.36 +/- 0.91 vs. 1.74 +/- 0.63 liters for H for the O(2) deficit vs. ROC (P < 0.05). When the kinetics were viewed as two separate components with independent onsets, the calculated O(2) deficit (2.89 +/- 0.79 and 1.71 +/- 0.70 liters for VH and H, respectively) was not different from the measured ROC (P < 0.05). Subjects also performed the same work rate for only 3 min. These data, from bouts terminated before the slow component could contribute appreciably to the overall VO(2) response, show that the O(2) requirement during the transition is less than the final steady state for the work rate, as evidenced by symmetry between the O(2) deficit and ROC. This new method of calculating the O(2) deficit more closely reflects the expected O(2) deficit-ROC relationship (i.e., ROC >/= O(2) deficit). Therefore, estimation of the O(2) deficit during heavy exercise transitions should consider the slow component of VO(2) as an additional deficit component with delayed onset.