Does identifying a discharge as "against medical advice" confer legal protection?

J Fam Pract. 2000 Mar;49(3):224-7.

Abstract

Background: One in every 65 to 120 discharges from general hospitals are against medical advice and have an expected increased risk of adverse consequences and subsequent litigation. Does the term "against medical advice" confer legal protection?

Methods: We searched the MEDLINE and PsychInfo databases for relevant articles. We also searched the national medico-legal databases of LEXIS-NEXIS. Additional case law was obtained through a search for "against medical advice" in the West Premise CD-ROM database of New York State cases.

Results: We found 8 relevant cases. There was no case in which "against medical advice" was entirely protective, though partial protection existed in some cases.

Conclusions: Since patients are admitted voluntarily to a general hospital, a discharge against medical advice is merely a withdrawal of the original consent.

Publication types

  • Case Reports
  • Legal Case

MeSH terms

  • Fatal Outcome
  • Female
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Jurisprudence
  • Liability, Legal*
  • Male
  • Malpractice / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • New York
  • Patient Discharge / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • Treatment Refusal / legislation & jurisprudence*
  • United States