Predictors of success in radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial flutter

J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan:4 Suppl 1:121-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1009851119938.

Abstract

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter at the isthmus between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava is established. However in selected patients, the creation of a continuous linear lesion at the targeted isthmus requires a lengthened procedure or is not feasible at all and atrial flutter recurrences are common. In a retrospective analysis, we found that an intraoperatively determined distance between the tricuspid annulus and the inferior vena cava of <.2.5 cm is an independent predictor of a lengthened or failed ablation procedure. Additional equipment, e.g., long introducer sheaths, adapted ablation catheter design, or irrigated tip ablation, as well as alternative ablation approaches, e.g., linear lesions between the tricuspid annulus and Eustachian ridge, have been invented in order to increase the acute success rate or decrease fluoroscopy and procedure time. In a prospective study on the effects of various conduction properties at the isthmus between tricuspid annulus and inferior vena cava following radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter, we showed previously that others than a complete bidirectional conduction block predicts a high recurrence rate of atrial flutter. For determination of transisthmal conduction properties following ablation, established mapping approaches are documentation of double potentials at the ablation line and right atrial activation sequence following posteroseptal and low lateral right atrial pacing. Novel threedimensional mapping systems, i.e., Carto(R) and EnSite(R), may further enhance the accuracy of conventional mapping techniques.

MeSH terms

  • Atrial Flutter / mortality
  • Atrial Flutter / surgery*
  • Catheter Ablation / methods*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Recurrence
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome