Cardiac effects of clevidipine, a new ultrashort-acting dihydropyridine Ca2+ channel antagonist were investigated in Langendorff-perfused rat hearts and compared to those of nifedipine and isradipine. The aim was to determine and compare the negative inotropic vs. chronotropic potency of these drugs. The hearts were perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Henseleit buffer at a perfusion pressure of 90 cm H2O. After stabilization, one concentration of each drug was administered for 45 min followed by a higher concentration for an additional 45 min. The concentrations of each drug in this study were 10(-9), 3 x 10(-9), 10(-8), 10(-7), 10(-6.5) and 10(-6) M for clevidipine and nifedipine, and 10(-10), 3 x 10(-10), 10(-9), 10(-8), 10(-7.5) and 10(-7) M for isradipine. Each concentration of each drug was tested in six hearts. Coronary flow, left ventricular dP/dt max, left ventricular systolic pressure and heart rate were recorded when the hearts were beating spontaneously and during pacing at a constant rate for 1 min. Spontaneous heart rate and atrio-ventricular conduction were not affected by clevidipine at any of the concentrations studied, while nifedipine and isradipine caused a concentration-dependent decrease. These two drugs caused atrio-ventricular block at high concentrations. All three compounds reduced cardiac contractility in a concentration-dependent manner. When isradipine was administered, at a given concentration, heart rate and contractility decreased proportionately. When clevidipine or nifedipine was given, at a given concentration, the proportionate reduction in left ventricular dP/dt max was greater than that in heart rate, resulting in a high inotropic vs. chronotropic selectivity. It is concluded that in contrast to nifedipine and isradipine, clevidipine does not impair atrio-ventricular conduction. Like nifedipine, clevidipine is selective for inotropic vs. chronotropic cardiac effects.