Daylight Saving Time Practice and the Rate of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in the United States: A Probabilistic Assessment in a Large Nationwide Study

Benjamin A Satterfield; Ozan Dikilitas; Holly Van Houten; Xiaoxi Yao; Bernard J Gersh

doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.12.006

Daylight Saving Time Practice and the Rate of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in the United States: A Probabilistic Assessment in a Large Nationwide Study

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Jan 5;8(1):45-52. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.12.006. eCollection 2024 Feb.

Authors

Benjamin A Satterfield¹, Ozan Dikilitas², Holly Van Houten^{3

4}, Xiaoxi Yao^{1

3}, Bernard J Gersh¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
² Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
³ Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
⁴ OptumLabs, Minnetonka, MN.

Abstract

We investigated the association of daylight saving time (DST) transitions with the rates of adverse cardiovascular events in a large, US-based nationwide study. The study cohort included 36,116,951 unique individuals from deidentified administrative claims data of the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. There were 74,722 total adverse cardiovascular events during DST transition and the control weeks (2 weeks before and after) in spring and autumn of 2015-2019. We used Bayesian hierarchical Poisson regression models to estimate event rate ratios representing the ratio of composite adverse cardiovascular event rates between DST transition and control weeks. There was an average increase of 3% (95% uncertainty interval, -3% to -10%) and 4% (95% uncertainty interval, -2% to -12%) in adverse cardiovascular event rates during Monday and Friday of the spring DST transition, respectively. The probability of this being associated with a moderate-to-large increase in the event rates (estimate event rate ratio, >1.10) was estimated to be less than 6% for Monday and Friday, and less than 1% for the remaining days. During autumn DST transition, the probability of any decrease in adverse cardiovascular event rates was estimated to be less than 46% and a moderate-to-large decrease in the event rates to be less than 4% across all days. Results were similar when adjusted by age. In conclusion, spring DST transition had a suggestive association with a minor increase in adverse cardiovascular event rates but with a very low estimated probability to be of clinical importance. Our findings suggest that DST transitions are unlikely to meaningfully impact the rate of cardiovascular events.